Accessibility

Digital accessibility

 
  • The application of article 47 of the law of February 11, 2005 for equal rights and opportunities, participation and citizenship of disabled people stipulates that all online state services must be accessible to all and all.
  • The dr-aubert.fr site has been designed to be accessible to as many people as possible, and in particular to people with disabilities.
  • Thus, all Internet users must be able to access all the content of the site without their possible disability constituting an obstacle.
  • In order to be usable by people with disabilities using different means of navigation (navigation without mouse, without keyboard), specialized software or hardware (voice reader, Braille range) or requiring customization of the display of the site (magnification of characters, quality of contrasts), the site complies with the recommendations of the RGAA.
  • In order to maintain this high level of quality, the dr-aubert.fr teams continually follow accessibility standards when updating the site. The digital accessibility standards include the following conditions, among others:
    • font sizes can be enlarged and reduced the images present, when they require it, alternative texts language changes are reported
    • the titles are established on several levels
    • tables are accessible to voice readers
    • it is possible to browse this site without using the mouse, using tab navigation color contrasts are sufficiently
    • contrasting or changeable the pages are correctly structured and uniform, both in terms of graphics and editorial line
    • forms are accessible from any medium (desktop, tablet, mobile phone)
    • the layout of the site is separated from its content through the use of style sheets.
    • The use of CSS positioning properties, by completely separating presentation and content, allows documents to maintain a coherent order outside of CSS: title, menus, content…
    • the HTML code used to build this site complies with W3C recommendations and has been tested using the HTML validator of this consortium
 
 

Dr Aubert's accessibility politics

 

Dr Aubert is committed to a process aimed at respecting the consideration of digital accessibility in general and the RGAA (General Reference for Improving Accessibility) in particular.

To comply with the expectations of the Interministerial Directorate for Digital and the State Information and Communication System (DINSIC), the dr-aubert.fr site bases its compliance on version 4.0 of the RGAA. To enable its various departments to take full account of this accessibility requirement, Dr Aubert has carried out several actions:

  • awareness and training for its staff and service providers
  • consideration of accessibility throughout the creative process
  • the creation of a good practice guide
  • the ongoing appointment of an internal referent for accessibility
 
 

Compliance Status

 

 

The dr-aubert.fr site is partially compliant with the general reference for improving accessibility RGAA version 4.1, an internal audit has been carried out on the site but dr-aubert.fr has been designed to be accessible to as many people as possible. large number of people, especially people with disabilities.

Non-conformities and possible deviations are listed below.

 

Content not subject to the accessibility requirement

  • Third-party content that is not funded or developed by the organization concerned and not under its control (example online framework and YouTube player)
  • Files available in office formats
  • Pre-recorded audio and video content, including those with interactive components

Not accessible content

  • Criterion 1.2. Is each decoration image properly ignored by assistive technologies?
  • Criterion 3.1. In each web page, the information should not be given only by color. Is this rule respected?
  • Criterion 7.1. Is each script, if necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
  • Criterion 8.2. For each web page, is the source code generated valid according to the type of document specified?
  • Criterion 8.9. In every web page, tags should not be used for presentation purposes only. Is this rule respected?
  • Criterion 10.3. On each web page, does the information remain understandable when style sheets are disabled?
  • Criterion 12.4. In each set of pages, is the “site map” page reachable in the same way?
  • Criterion 13.3. On each web page, does each office document for download have, if necessary, an accessible version (except in special cases)?

This corresponds to approximately 10% of the criteria of the RGAA Version 4.1 which are non-compliant.